Life Outside The Binary
Nonbinary Transgender Information Centre

when writing transgender 101 guides directed towards cis people, please consider:

androgyneity:

  • NOT including intimate details of physical transition (including surgical and hormonal treatments, presentation techniques and devices used by some trans people to manage the appearance of their physical sex characteristics).
  • Cis people are already obsessed with our bodies in a really unhealthy way that often comes out in fetishization, repulsion, tokenization or general inappropriate fascination. It’s not helping trans people’s interests to make one of the first things you tell cis people about us be all the gritty details about our physical bodies, when so much of transgender identity is already medicalized, pathologized and seen as a strictly physical thing.
  • Also it’s none of their goddamn business what trans people do with their bodies. It’s not like you’re providing this information as a resource to people who will benefit from it, you’re literally just sating their curiosity and by extension alienating the group you’re attempting to speak for.
  • It gives cis people a sense of knowledge of trans bodies, which reinforces their entitlement to demand intimate information from usabout our medical histories. (because they “get it”).
  • It creates the expectation in cis people’s minds that transness is defined by these physical steps you’re describing, and delegitimizes the identities of trans people who make not take some or any of those steps.
  • If you’re going to provide this information (which, to be entirely honest I can’t think of a legitimate reason why you would need to provide in-depth information about trans bodies to cis people who were not serving a health/care-providing roll to trans people) at least Do Not put it in the 101 “basic information” package. Because it is not 101, the information you provide will invariably be oversimplified and misguiding, it is not important to developing a basic understanding of trans people and issues, and if you’ve gotten to the point of describing the ins and outs of trans medical treatment within your first few sections than i guarantee you there’s probably a dozen more important and more relevant topics you haven’t covered.

I’m not saying avoid these topics all together if you want to talk about dysphoria and how some people get surgeries and/or take hormones and/or change their physical presentation to feel more comfortable.

I’m saying you don’t need to provide detailed, in-depth descriptions of trans medical treatment and the ways in which trans people relate to their physical bodies, because it’s not relevant, it’s none of their damn business, and we don’t need to have cis people any more fixated on trans people’s bodies and medical decisions than they already are.

Anonymous:
How does viewing dysphoria as a necessary component of being trans make me transphobic? I am a trans woman.

tonidorsay:

Because not all trans people are dysphoric in a measurable level – meaning that for all intents and purposes, they are not such.

Being trans, in and of itself, does not allow one to escape being transphobic. Indeed, in a transphobic culture, all persons are transphobic.

IT is a necessary requirement for certain medical involvement.

lastly, the fight for trans rights, and dignity, and respect is not about who is or who is not trans – that’s small minded and myopic, and comes fro a ciscentric worldview that is fundamentally flawed and works to oppress trans people, instead of liberate them.

Anonymous:
i luv watchin u get ur ass handed to u by truscum<3

genderpunkrock-deactivated20161:

y’know, just for fun, i’m gonna make this my truscum masterpost.

what truscum means

why we all hate truscum (more on the racism here)

my truscum ref tag

tonidorsay crushing truscum (granted it was more directed towards radfems but iits still applicable)

lavernecox stating that transness is self-determined, and a brutal explanation of oppression vs. privilege

Janet Mock? Wrote in her book that she believes in less gate keeping for trans people, and that gender dysphoria is not a necessary diagnosis to be trans.

Laura Jane Grace isn’t so interested in bottom surgery, either.

y’all claim to be so diverse, too? and yet >50% of you are all 15-21 yr old unemployed white american pre-everything trans guys who haven’t been out for more than 3 years.

and, just for kicks, the DSM-V factsheet on Gender Dysphoria and the DSM-IV to V changelog (pg 14), where it in never in anyway says you need dysphoria to be trans.

Bonus round!

a big argument on this post, disproved and taken down

truscum don’t actually care about your dysphoria, they only care if you agree with them and join their gang of bullies

why transmedicalist ideology falls flat in the face of the actual medical industry

confessions from an ex-truscum

biological sex is bullshit: 1, 2, 3, 4

where the “cosmetic transition” bullshit came from

why neopronouns are not “harmful”: 1, 2

codes by
pohroro